I think it can. Any question about what it is Barack Hussein Obama stands for can no longer be in doubt.
Where shall we begin? Let us start on the campaign trail, with our fearless leader's own words. He said himself he was setting out to fundamentally change America. He started with AIG, then went on to the banks, then went on to the car companies. On one hand he took taxpayer dollars to apply a short term, false solution to an economic problem that has been brewing for ages. He stole money from taxpayers to build a foundation made out of toothpicks for a structure made of steel beams of which the rivets have been working themselves loose for roughly seventy years. When he wasn't doing that, he occupied himself with printing more and more of our fiat currency and driving the value of our dollar to an all-time low.
It is simple economics folks. Lets say I had two apples, and my neighbor wanted one. Since I only have two apples, they are both of extremely high value to me because of the limited number I possess. But lets say I had ten apples and my neighbor wanted one. I would say to myself, "Of course you can have one, I have plenty." It is the same with the dollar. The less the actual physical amount of dollars exists in the economy, the more valuable each dollar is. So, when the feds continue to print and print and print dollars, what happens to the value thereof?
When Obama wasn't destroying our economy or devaluing the dollar, he was busy projecting weakness throughout the world. He has stabbed Israel in the back, he has forbidden the use of phrases such as "Muslim terrorist," and he has constantly apologized to the world for the past two centuries of American greatness, literally bowing to leaders of nations that have longed bowed to the great United States.
After that, he goes after state sovereignty by labeling Arizona's decision to enforce the law as "possibly racist." Further, he rejects separation of powers by trashing a correct, accurate and in line with precedent decision that the US Supreme Court made during the State of the Union Address that he incorrectly interpreted! Also, he attacks the Police Department of Cambridge, MA, by saying that Sgt. Crowley, an officer with an impeccable record, "acted stupidly" by enforcing the law that he has been trained to and gets paid to. Apparently, our president has little or no respect for the rule of law.
So, after the banks, the investment firms, the car companies, the market, the constitution, and now, the Gulf of Mexico, ask yourself, "What is the next target that Obama will fix his almighty cannon against?"
He is now going after the very institution that quite possibly got him elected. That is right, he now seeks to destroy the press, the free press, the one institution that has been, love them or hate them, the one thing that has been able to cry foul, whether you agree with them or not.
Our president, again turning everywhere but to the Constitution, has pointed out that the print media in foreign nations are doing so much better than ours because they are subsidized by the government! Obama has said that since the dawn of the Internet, the revenue of print media has been steadily decreasing. Yes, this is true. So now Obama is coming to the rescue yet again and asking for money from the Congress to prop up the print media, because, according to Obama, it would be a shame to lose this great institution of America. Obama is pushing for a subsidized news media.
Tied in with this is something very, very important. A push by this administration to heavily regulate and supervise the information on the Internet is under way and is being sold as necessary to the security of this nation.
So, let's think about this. Obama wants to regulate the Internet and at the same time give money to the print media. Hmm, so he will control the information on the Internet and at the same time subsidize print media. Hmm, so doesn't it stand to reason that all of this is solely due to the desire of this administration to control information?
Give somebody money to do something (for example, print only the info you want printed), and put a stranglehold on those who don't listen to you when you simply ask nicely (for example, all the information on the Internet that tells the truth about Obama that he wishes would go away).
This administration runs this country like a mob boss runs his city, through brute force.
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse, it does.
Does the name Petrobras mean anything to anyone out there? Well, if it doesn't now, make note of it and remember it.
The following is scary, shocking stuff. This is huge.
Petrobras is a Brazilian oil company. They are the largest and most successful oil company in Brazil, turning a one billion dollar plus a year profit, and a few years ago, it was nationalized by the Brazilian government.
What concern of this is ours, you ask?
Let's look at the way Obama is punishing BP for the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. Back in May, Obama demanded that an escrow account be established by BP and that BP incur the price of all the cleanup, damages, etc., from this disaster. Now, I have no problem with BP doing so, but the problem is that the president has no constitutional power or authority to do what Obama did.
So, Obama continues to "keep a boot to the throat of BP," and make damn well sure that he does as much financial damage to BP as humanly possible, all under the guise of fixing the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.
Remember George Soros? Well, George Soros of Moveon.org fame is, as well all know, a huge supporter of Obama. Also, Mr. Soros was a very big campaign donor to the Obama campaign.
Now, work with me here. Remember everything I am telling you. Petrobras is a nationalized Brazilian oil company. The Obama administration continues to shake down BP and run them into the ground. Obama has failed to be authoritative on the situation in the Gulf, letting the oil flow while he goes to "clear his mind" on the golf course, AGAIN! Obama also put a halt to ALL oil drilling in the Gulf, so he is personally putting people out of work. George Soros was a donor and is a supporter of Obama.
Now, keep all that in mind.
Shortly after Obama was elected he pushed a law through the Congress and Senate that required any and all oil companies drilling within American waters or on American soil to drill NO DEEPER THAN 1620 km.
Now, George Soros recently invested a large sum of his own money in Petrobras and became the owner of a good number of shares. The oil company Petrobras's deepest well is currently at 2260 km, obviously well beyond the mark set by the Obama administration.
Drum roll please . . . Two days after George Soros, a supporter and benefactor of Obama, invested his money in Petrobras, which is drilling way beyond Obama's self determined mark, the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ALLOTTED TWO BILLION DOLLARS OF AMERICAN MONEY TO PETROBRAS OIL.
Ask yourself now why Obama continues to let the oil flow.
As Billy once said, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark."
There is an old Scottish folk song entitled "Both Sides the Tweed." The Tweed is a river that forms part of the border between Scotland and England. Originally, the song was an attack upon the Treaty of Union of 1707 in which Scotland essentially forfeited their sovereignty to England. However, it was changed a little and and it made a resurgence in 1979 after the Scots finally voted, albeit way overdue, for a separate parliament from the English. This was subsequently vetoed by the English Parliament due to their infamous "40% of all eligible votes" clause, which counts votes of abstentions as votes against.
I can't stand the English.
In this song we read a few lines that are extremely relevant to America right now:
"What's the spring-breathing jasmine and rose?
What's the summer with all its gay train
Or the splendour of autumn to those
Who've bartered their freedom for gain?
"Let virtue distinguish the brave
Place riches in lowest degree
Think them poorest who can be a slave
Them richest who dare to be free."
So, now what folks, now what? Like the wife of a sea captain, who walked the lonely widow walk on the roof of her house, constructed by her loyal husband with his own bare hands, waiting for his return from the briny Atlantic, we now too must wait. We, like so many woman of Old New England, now do the same, but for us, it is a widower's walk. We walk that lonely widower's walk, waiting for our devoted and loyal spouse, Lady Liberty to return to our shores yet again.
We wait, we pray, that the bloodshed of millions, the labor of billions, the sacrifice of so many has not been in vain. We wait and pray, while walking that widower's walk, that the bride of so many young men that willingly laid down their lives for, the bride Lady Liberty, who so many great men and women worked their fingers to the bone for, we await her return from foreign and distant shores. We watch across the briny and windswept Atlantic for our spouse Lady Liberty to make a triumphant and glorious return to our shores yet again. We look for that glimmer on the horizon, that lamp at night that signaled the return of the captain. Our we look for the bright white sails as they make themselves visible, heralding the return of the captain. But again, for us, we await the return of our bride, Lady Liberty.
No comments:
Post a Comment